<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photography: Getting Started in Stock Photography &#8211; Part 2: Demo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterbergdahl.com/blog/146/photography-getting-started-in-stock-photography-part-2-demo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterbergdahl.com/blog/146/photography-getting-started-in-stock-photography-part-2-demo/</link>
	<description>Discovering The World Around Me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:08:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bergdahl</title>
		<link>http://peterbergdahl.com/blog/146/photography-getting-started-in-stock-photography-part-2-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bergdahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterbergdahl.com/blog/?p=146#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Hi Ronalds,

Thanks for your nice comment and very valuable question.

The formula i use in &quot;real life&quot; is a slightly modified version of the one i mention in the video. I can&#039;t reveal exactly how my own formula looks because it&#039;s part of a paid product i sell to stock photographers but I can give you a general idea how it works.

Provided the score you calculate is the same or similar for two different niches you should pick the niche with the highest number of downloads or the highest number of searches if you can find that information.

I should have mentioned this in the video when I recorded it but that is too late now. Instead I will mention it in the blogpost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ronalds,</p>
<p>Thanks for your nice comment and very valuable question.</p>
<p>The formula i use in &#8220;real life&#8221; is a slightly modified version of the one i mention in the video. I can&#8217;t reveal exactly how my own formula looks because it&#8217;s part of a paid product i sell to stock photographers but I can give you a general idea how it works.</p>
<p>Provided the score you calculate is the same or similar for two different niches you should pick the niche with the highest number of downloads or the highest number of searches if you can find that information.</p>
<p>I should have mentioned this in the video when I recorded it but that is too late now. Instead I will mention it in the blogpost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronalds Šulcs</title>
		<link>http://peterbergdahl.com/blog/146/photography-getting-started-in-stock-photography-part-2-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronalds Šulcs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterbergdahl.com/blog/?p=146#comment-499</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great video. 
Ive made just my own research by this method. I have numbers between 2-85...
Should i pick niche with a low competition, but also with a very low search results (max 200)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great video.<br />
Ive made just my own research by this method. I have numbers between 2-85&#8230;<br />
Should i pick niche with a low competition, but also with a very low search results (max 200)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

